Ancient Honor and Bisexual Norms

Here are a couple of essays to jump start the new year:

“Reading Biblical Narrative with Its Ancient Audience”, by Philip Esler.

“Paul opposed Roman (bisexual) norms, not gay marriage”, by Richard Fellows.

Esler looks at some basic stuff, such as honorably appropriate responses to battle (failed by David in II Sam 10-12)), the bitter animosity between co-wives (causing Hannah to shame Penninah in I Sam 1-2), and other things which in typical Context-Group fashion “wash away modern, Northern Atlantic understandings of what the biblical texts mean and find something very different underneath”.

Fellows puts to bed a particular modern western reading of Paul, namely his condemnation of homoeroticism. “When reading 1 Cor 6:9 and Rom 1:26-27, it is natural for us to assume that Paul has in mind the actions of a group equivalent to modern homosexuals — a persecuted minority who represent about 2% of western society. Rather than having such people in view, Paul is attacking the sexual practices of the majority of Romans, and that these practices can better be described as bisexual and unfaithful.” A lot of data in this well-crafted post.

Happy New Year to all.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s